Home
|
The Society
|
Membership
|
Board of Directors
|
Multinational Finance Journal
|
Annual Conferences
Search
Date Range
in
Title
Author
Abstract
Full Text
Keywords
All Years
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
to:
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Forthcoming Articles
Published Articles
Volume 28 (2024)
Volume 28, Numbers 3 & 4
38-75 (September/December 2024)
Volume 28, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-37 (March/June 2018)
Volume 26 (2023)
Volume 27, Numbers 3 & 4
48-66 (September/December 2023)
Volume 27, Numbers 1 & 2
1-47 (March/June 2023)
Volume 26 (2022)
Volume 26, Numbers 3 & 4
27-59 (September/December 2022)
Volume 26, Numbers 1 & 2
1-26 (March/June 2022)
Volume 25 (2021)
Volume 25, Numbers 3 & 4
(September/December 2021)
Volume 25, Numbers 1 & 2
(March/June 2021)
Volume 24 (2020)
Volume 24, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 119-266 (September/December 2020)
Volume 24, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-117 (March/June 2020)
Volume 23 (2019)
Volume 23, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 141-272 (September/December 2019)
Volume 23, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-139 (March/June 2019)
Volume 22 (2018)
Volume 22, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 119-254 (September/December 2018)
Volume 22, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-118 (March/June 2018)
Volume 21 (2017)
Volume 21, Number 4
Pages 211-283 (December 2017)
Volume 21, Number 3
Pages 133-210 (September 2017)
Volume 21, Number 2
Pages 49-132 (June 2017)
Volume 21, Number 1
Pages 1-48 (March 2017)
Volume 20 (2016)
Volume 20, Number 4
Pages 273-354 (December 2016)
Volume 20, Number 3
Pages 181-271 (September 2016)
Volume 20, Number 2
Pages 85-179 (June 2016)
Volume 20, Number 1
Pages 1-83 (March 2016)
Volume 19 (2015)
Volume 19, Number 4
Pages 223-313 (December 2015)
Volume 19, Number 3
Pages 149-221 (September 2015)
Volume 19, Number 2
Pages 77-147 (June 2015)
Volume 19, Number 1
Pages 1-75 (March 2015)
Volume 18 (2014)
Volume 18, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 169-336 (September/December 2014)
Volume 18, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-167 (March/June 2014)
Volume 17 (2013)
Volume 17, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 149-369 (September/December 2013)
Volume 17, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-148 (March/June 2013)
Volume 16 (2012)
Volume 16, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 155-301 (September/December 2012)
Volume 16, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-154 (March/June 2012)
Volume 15 (2011)
Volume 15, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 157-296 (September/December 2011)
Volume 15, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-156 (March/June 2011)
Volume 14 (2010)
Volume 14, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 153-317 (September/December 2010)
Volume 14, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-151 (March/June 2010)
Volume 13 (2009)
Volume 13, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 155-321 (September/December 2009)
Volume 13, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-154 (March/June 2009)
Volume 12 (2008)
Volume 12, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 157-312 (September/December 2008)
Volume 12, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-155 (March/June 2008)
Volume 11 (2007)
Volume 11, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 157-322 (September/December 2007)
Volume 11, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-156 (March/June 2007)
Volume 10 (2006)
Volume 10, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 153-305 (September/December 2006)
Volume 10, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-151 (March/June 2006)
Volume 9 (2005)
Volume 9, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 131-269 (September/December 2005)
Volume 9, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-130 (March/June 2005)
Volume 8 (2004)
Volume 8, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 141-274 (September/December 2004)
Volume 8, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-139 (March/June 2004)
Volume 7 (2003)
Volume 7, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 107-230 (September/December 2003)
Volume 7, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-106 (March/June 2003)
Volume 6 (2002)
Volume 6, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 131-258 (September/December 2002)
Volume 6, Number 2
Pages 65-130 (June 2002)
Volume 6, Number 1
Pages 1-63 (March 2002)
Volume 5 (2001)
Volume 5, Number 4
Pages 225-311 (December 2001)
Volume 5, Number 3
Pages 155-224 (September 2001)
Volume 5, Number 2
Pages 87-154 (June 2001)
Volume 5, Number 1
Pages 1-86 (March 2001)
Volume 4 (2000)
Volume 4, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 159-288 (September/December 2000)
Volume 4, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 5-153 (March/June 2000)
Volume 3 (1999)
Volume 3, Number 4
Pages 223-282 (December 1999)
Volume 3, Number 3
Pages 147-221 (September 1999)
Volume 3, Number 2
Pages 71-145 (June 1999)
Volume 3, Number 1
Pages 1-70 (March 1999)
Volume 2 (1998)
Volume 2, Number 4
Pages 245-310 (December 1998)
Volume 2, Number 3
Pages 167-244 (September 1998)
Volume 2, Number 2
Pages 85-165 (June 1998)
Volume 2, Number 1
Pages 1-83 (March 1998)
Volume 1 (1997)
Volume 1, Number 4
Pages 255-324 (December 1997)
Volume 1, Number 3
Pages 169-254 (September 1997)
Volume 1, Number 2
Pages 93-168 (June 1997)
Volume 1, Number 1
Pages 1-80 (March 1997)
Forthcoming Articles
()
General Information
()
Published Articles By Year
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
1997 - 2025
Volume 11, Numbers 1 & 2 / March/June 2007 , Pages 1-156
Download Article 134.64 Kb
Factors Determining Mergers of Banks in Malaysia’s Banking Sector Reform
Multinational Finance Journal, 2007, vol. 11, no. 1/2, pp. 1-31 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/11-1/2-1
Rubi Ahmad
, University of Malaya, Malaysia
Corresponding Author
Email: rubi@um.edu.my
Mohamed Ariff
, Bond University, Australia
Michael Skully
, Monash University, Australia
Abstract:
What was termed government-guided merger was a unique banking sector reform implemented in 2002 by the central bank of Malaysia guiding a larger number of depository institutions to form 10 large banks. This paper identifies the factors entering this massive merger exercise. Similar to the finding in bank merger literature, we find larger banks became acquirers. Also, low risk banks had higher probability of becoming an acquiring bank while high-risk banks became targets for takeover. Surprisingly managerial performance—financial ratios and changes in productivity reported as significant factors in prior market-based merger studies—was not significant in this study. Banks closely connected to government had greater chance of becoming acquiring banks while the reverse is true of target banks. These findings have not been reported in other studies of mergers, and are likely to be useful to central banks considering similar reforms.
Keywords : bank mergers; acquiring banks; managerial performance; government connections
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 279 Kb
Are Failure Prediction Models Widely Usable? An Empirical Study Using a Belgian Dataset
Multinational Finance Journal, 2007, vol. 11, no. 1/2, pp. 33-76 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/11-1/2-2
Hubert Ooghe
, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School and Ghent University, Belgium
Corresponding Author
Email: Hubert.Ooghe@Vlerick.be
Sofie Balcaen
, Ghent University, Belgium
Abstract:
Faced with the question as to whether failure prediction models can easily be transferred and applied to a new data setting, this study examines the performance of seven models on a dataset of Belgian company failures after re-estimation of the coefficients. The validation results indicate that some models are widely usable: they are strongly predictive when applied to the new data set. The Gloubos-Grammatikos models and Keasey-McGuinness appear among the best performing models, and also Ooghe-Joos-De Vos and Zavgren seem to be widely usable, respectively for failure prediction 1 and 3 years prior to failure. At the same time, the Altman and Bilderbeek models show very poor results when applied to the Belgian dataset. The best performing models seem to combine the right variables in an intuitively right sense and it appears that the combination of some types of variables generally leads to good predictive results. On the contrary, the estimation technique, complexity and number of variables do not explain the predictive performances.
Keywords : failure prediction model; international comparison; validation; annual accounts; re-estimation
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 112.03 Kb
Simulating Firm-Specific Corporate Marginal Tax Rates in a Canadian Context
Multinational Finance Journal, 2007, vol. 11, no. 1/2, pp. 77-96 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/11-1/2-3
Amin Mawani
, York University, Toronto, Canada
Corresponding Author
Email: amawani@ssb.yorku.ca
Abstract:
This paper illustrates a methodology for estimating corporate marginal tax rates in the presence of tax losses, and within the context of Canadian tax law.
Keywords : taxation; marginal tax rates; tax losses; corporate tax rates.
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 164.46 Kb
U.K. Stock Market Inefficiencies and the Risk Premium
Multinational Finance Journal, 2007, vol. 11, no. 1/2, pp. 97-122 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/11-1/2-4
Antonis Demos
, Athens University of Economics and Business, Greece
Corresponding Author
Email: demos@aueb.gr
George Vasillelis
, Imperial College and Dresdner-Kleinwort-Benson Bank, U.K.
Abstract:
The stock market predictability has been a favorite topic of scholars and practitioners alike. It seems that some small predictability is present in all major stock markets worldwide. This predictability can be attributed to the risk premium structure and/or to inefficiencies present in the markets. This paper investigates the predictability of returns of some major shares listed in the London Stock exchange, using economic as well as accounting variables. We first measure the predictability of these variables by regressing individual stock returns on their corresponding accounting variables and the economic ones. Second, we estimate for the returns a seasonal latent factor model with time varying volatility. Provided that our measure of risk is an adequate one, the residuals of this estimation are free of the predictability of risk premium, and consequently one expects that any accounting and factor economic variables would have no predictive power. An LM-type test is developed and employed to indicate that indeed the U.K. stock market predictability is due to the risk premium structure, and the explanatory power of the variables considered here is due to them being an approximation of risk. However, when we perform the test jointly for all assets, we reject the zero predictability hypothesis at 5% but not at 1%.
Keywords : conditional heteroskedastic latent factor; LM test; stock returns
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 688.15 Kb
Mispricing Persistence and the Effectiveness of Arbitrage Trading
Multinational Finance Journal, 2007, vol. 11, no. 1/2, pp.123-156 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/11-1/2-5
Pascal Alphonse
, Lille School of Management, University of Lille 2, France
Corresponding Author
Email: pascal.alphonse@skema.edu
Abstract:
This article examines whether mean reversion in stock index basis changes is actually induced by arbitrage trading, using intra-day arbitrage trade data. The empirical evidence suggests that arbitrage trading alone cannot account for all of the mean reversion in basis changes, even when infrequent trading is controlled for. This general mean reversion is consistent with mean reversion in liquidity and partial adjustment in the cash market. The behavior of arbitrageurs appears highly competitive. We find that on average the net arbitrage profit is at the competitive level of zero. Furthermore, it is suggested that some mispricing persistence may be related to time-varying liquidity. Accordingly, the results indicate that arbitrageurs pay attention to the depth of the market and value the early unwinding option
Keywords : market microstructure; arbitrage trading; liquidity; stock index futures; market efficiency
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Copyright © 2010. All rights reserved. Multinational Finace Society. Design and Development by:
Exarsis Business Solutions Ltd.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
.