Home
|
The Society
|
Membership
|
Board of Directors
|
Multinational Finance Journal
|
Annual Conferences
Search
Date Range
in
Title
Author
Abstract
Full Text
Keywords
All Years
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
to:
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Forthcoming Articles
Published Articles
Volume 28 (2024)
Volume 28, Numbers 3 & 4
38-75 (September/December 2024)
Volume 28, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-37 (March/June 2018)
Volume 26 (2023)
Volume 27, Numbers 3 & 4
48-66 (September/December 2023)
Volume 27, Numbers 1 & 2
1-47 (March/June 2023)
Volume 26 (2022)
Volume 26, Numbers 3 & 4
27-59 (September/December 2022)
Volume 26, Numbers 1 & 2
1-26 (March/June 2022)
Volume 25 (2021)
Volume 25, Numbers 3 & 4
(September/December 2021)
Volume 25, Numbers 1 & 2
(March/June 2021)
Volume 24 (2020)
Volume 24, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 119-266 (September/December 2020)
Volume 24, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-117 (March/June 2020)
Volume 23 (2019)
Volume 23, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 141-272 (September/December 2019)
Volume 23, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-139 (March/June 2019)
Volume 22 (2018)
Volume 22, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 119-254 (September/December 2018)
Volume 22, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-118 (March/June 2018)
Volume 21 (2017)
Volume 21, Number 4
Pages 211-283 (December 2017)
Volume 21, Number 3
Pages 133-210 (September 2017)
Volume 21, Number 2
Pages 49-132 (June 2017)
Volume 21, Number 1
Pages 1-48 (March 2017)
Volume 20 (2016)
Volume 20, Number 4
Pages 273-354 (December 2016)
Volume 20, Number 3
Pages 181-271 (September 2016)
Volume 20, Number 2
Pages 85-179 (June 2016)
Volume 20, Number 1
Pages 1-83 (March 2016)
Volume 19 (2015)
Volume 19, Number 4
Pages 223-313 (December 2015)
Volume 19, Number 3
Pages 149-221 (September 2015)
Volume 19, Number 2
Pages 77-147 (June 2015)
Volume 19, Number 1
Pages 1-75 (March 2015)
Volume 18 (2014)
Volume 18, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 169-336 (September/December 2014)
Volume 18, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-167 (March/June 2014)
Volume 17 (2013)
Volume 17, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 149-369 (September/December 2013)
Volume 17, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-148 (March/June 2013)
Volume 16 (2012)
Volume 16, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 155-301 (September/December 2012)
Volume 16, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-154 (March/June 2012)
Volume 15 (2011)
Volume 15, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 157-296 (September/December 2011)
Volume 15, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-156 (March/June 2011)
Volume 14 (2010)
Volume 14, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 153-317 (September/December 2010)
Volume 14, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-151 (March/June 2010)
Volume 13 (2009)
Volume 13, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 155-321 (September/December 2009)
Volume 13, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-154 (March/June 2009)
Volume 12 (2008)
Volume 12, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 157-312 (September/December 2008)
Volume 12, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-155 (March/June 2008)
Volume 11 (2007)
Volume 11, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 157-322 (September/December 2007)
Volume 11, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-156 (March/June 2007)
Volume 10 (2006)
Volume 10, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 153-305 (September/December 2006)
Volume 10, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-151 (March/June 2006)
Volume 9 (2005)
Volume 9, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 131-269 (September/December 2005)
Volume 9, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-130 (March/June 2005)
Volume 8 (2004)
Volume 8, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 141-274 (September/December 2004)
Volume 8, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-139 (March/June 2004)
Volume 7 (2003)
Volume 7, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 107-230 (September/December 2003)
Volume 7, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-106 (March/June 2003)
Volume 6 (2002)
Volume 6, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 131-258 (September/December 2002)
Volume 6, Number 2
Pages 65-130 (June 2002)
Volume 6, Number 1
Pages 1-63 (March 2002)
Volume 5 (2001)
Volume 5, Number 4
Pages 225-311 (December 2001)
Volume 5, Number 3
Pages 155-224 (September 2001)
Volume 5, Number 2
Pages 87-154 (June 2001)
Volume 5, Number 1
Pages 1-86 (March 2001)
Volume 4 (2000)
Volume 4, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 159-288 (September/December 2000)
Volume 4, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 5-153 (March/June 2000)
Volume 3 (1999)
Volume 3, Number 4
Pages 223-282 (December 1999)
Volume 3, Number 3
Pages 147-221 (September 1999)
Volume 3, Number 2
Pages 71-145 (June 1999)
Volume 3, Number 1
Pages 1-70 (March 1999)
Volume 2 (1998)
Volume 2, Number 4
Pages 245-310 (December 1998)
Volume 2, Number 3
Pages 167-244 (September 1998)
Volume 2, Number 2
Pages 85-165 (June 1998)
Volume 2, Number 1
Pages 1-83 (March 1998)
Volume 1 (1997)
Volume 1, Number 4
Pages 255-324 (December 1997)
Volume 1, Number 3
Pages 169-254 (September 1997)
Volume 1, Number 2
Pages 93-168 (June 1997)
Volume 1, Number 1
Pages 1-80 (March 1997)
Forthcoming Articles
()
General Information
()
Published Articles By Year
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
1997 - 2025
Volume 6, Numbers 3 & 4 / September/December 2002 , Pages 131-258
Download Article 31.46 Kb
Domestic versus International Portfolio Selection: A Statistical Examination of the Home Bias
Multinational Finance Journal, 2002, vol. 6, no. 3&4, pp. 131-166 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/6-3/4-1
Larry R. Gorman
, California Polytechnic State University, U.S.A.
Corresponding Author
Email: lgorman@calpoly.edu
Bjorn N. Jorgensen
, Columbia University, U.S.A.
Abstract:
The observed international home bias has traditionally been viewed as an anomaly. This paper provides statistical evidence contrary to this view within a mean-variance framework. Two methods of estimating the expected return and covariance parameters are investigated: (i) the traditional Markowitz approach, and (ii) the Bayes-Stein "shrinkage" algorithm. In-sample tests reveal that neither the Markowitz tangency allocation vectors nor the Bayes-Stein tangency allocation vectors are significantly different than a 100% domestic allocation (i.e. extreme home bias). These results are robust to the shorting of equity and across foreign exchange hedge strategies. The paper also reports out-of-sample tests with a view toward investment performance. Typically, a 100% domestic allocation outperforms both the Bayes-Stein and Markowitz tangency portfolios. Overall, the theorized gains to international diversification appear difficult to capture in practice and, hence, investors exhibiting a strong home bias are not necessarily acting irrationally.
Keywords : efficient allocation; foreign exchange hedging; home bias; international allocation; portfolio
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 135.4 Kb
The Dynamics and Stochastics of Currency Betas Based on the Unbiasedness Hypothesis in Foreign Exchange Markets
Multinational Finance Journal, 2002, vol. 6, no. 3&4, pp. 167-195 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/6-3/4-2
Winston T. Lin
, State University of New York at Buffalo, U.S.A.
Corresponding Author
Email: n/a
Hong-Jen Lin
, State University of New York at Buffalo, U.S.A.
Yueh H. Chen
, National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan
Abstract:
This article examines the dynamic and stochastic behavior of the beta coefficient (to be referred to as the currency beta) of the unbiasedness hypothesis (UH) in foreign exchange markets. We argue that the dynamics and stochastics of currency betas can be attributed to the dynamic behavior of various macroeconomic variables from different sectors of an economy, in addition to the trend variable considered in previous research. Incorporating four macroeconomic variables from the financial, real, and external sectors into the currency betas of eight currencies (developed and emerging) under a logarithmic change specification used to test the UH, we attempt to simultaneously test the behavior of currency betas in terms of nonstationarity, shifts in the mean and variance, and randomness. The vast quantity of empirical tests and results strongly suggests that the changing characteristics of currency betas are readily apparent and have important implications for the reconciliation of the controversies surrounding the legitimacy of the UH, for government exchange rate policies, and for the forecasting of future spot rates, across the developed and emerging economies under study. We also find different tales from developed and developing countries.
Keywords : four-step generalized; logarithmic change specification; macroeconomic variables; unbiasedness hypothesis; variable mean response
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 86.6 Kb
The Information Content of Earnings on Stock Prices: The Kuwait Stock Exchange
Multinational Finance Journal, 2002, vol. 6, no. 3&4, pp. 197-221 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/6-3/4-3
Rashid Al-Qenae
, University of Kuwait, Kuwait
Corresponding Author
Email: alrashed@cba.edu.kw
Carmen Li
, University of Essex, UK
Bob Wearing
, University of Essex, UK
Abstract:
This paper investigates the incremental information content of earnings and other macroeconomic variables for share prices within the ‘prices leading earnings’ framework. We find evidence supporting the phenomenon of ‘prices leading earnings’ for the Kuwait Stock Exchange (KSE) after controlling for basic macroeconomic indicators. That is, the estimated earnings response coefficient is found to be sensitive (and significant) to the leading periods and it increased when more leading periods were included. The results suggest that prices anticipate earnings and hence provide useful information to KSE investors
Keywords : earnings response coefficients; Kuwait Stock Exchange; price-leading earnings
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 135.01 Kb
The Sensitivity of European Bank Stocks to German Interest Rates Changes
Multinational Finance Journal, 2002, vol. 6, no. 3&4, pp. 223-249 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/6-3/4-4
Simon Stevenson
, University College Dublin, Ireland
Corresponding Author
Email: stevensn@blackrock.ucd.ie
Abstract:
This study examines the cross-border impact of central bank interest rate changes, using the example of the German Bundesbank. We examine the price impact of rate changes on both the general stock markets and on bank stocks in seven other European countries. The sample includes nations both within and outside of the European Union, and includes EU members who are participating in monetary union and members who obtained opt-outs. The results point to the existence of cross-border information transfers. Both non-German bank stocks and general equities react significantly to a large number of the Bundesbank rate changes. The results also indicate that European capital markets did differentiate between rate changes in terms of their relative importance. This was the case in terms of different responses between the financial institutions and the general equity markets and with regard to differing reactions between markets. In particular, those markets that were more committed to the exchange rate mechanism and the goal of monetary union generally reacted more than markets such as Denmark and UK. In addition, the importance of Bundesbank policy during the years leading up to EMU is supported by the fact that most non-German bank stocks reacted more to Bundesbank policy than to domestic rate changes and that no other country had the same level of influence on foreign equity returns.
Keywords : bank interest rate sensitivity; cross-border information transfers
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Copyright © 2010. All rights reserved. Multinational Finace Society. Design and Development by:
Exarsis Business Solutions Ltd.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
.