Home
|
The Society
|
Membership
|
Board of Directors
|
Multinational Finance Journal
|
Annual Conferences
Search
Date Range
in
Title
Author
Abstract
Full Text
Keywords
All Years
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
to:
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Forthcoming Articles
Published Articles
Volume 28 (2024)
Volume 28, Numbers 3 & 4
38-75 (September/December 2024)
Volume 28, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-37 (March/June 2018)
Volume 26 (2023)
Volume 27, Numbers 3 & 4
48-66 (September/December 2023)
Volume 27, Numbers 1 & 2
1-47 (March/June 2023)
Volume 26 (2022)
Volume 26, Numbers 3 & 4
27-59 (September/December 2022)
Volume 26, Numbers 1 & 2
1-26 (March/June 2022)
Volume 25 (2021)
Volume 25, Numbers 3 & 4
(September/December 2021)
Volume 25, Numbers 1 & 2
(March/June 2021)
Volume 24 (2020)
Volume 24, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 119-266 (September/December 2020)
Volume 24, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-117 (March/June 2020)
Volume 23 (2019)
Volume 23, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 141-272 (September/December 2019)
Volume 23, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-139 (March/June 2019)
Volume 22 (2018)
Volume 22, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 119-254 (September/December 2018)
Volume 22, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-118 (March/June 2018)
Volume 21 (2017)
Volume 21, Number 4
Pages 211-283 (December 2017)
Volume 21, Number 3
Pages 133-210 (September 2017)
Volume 21, Number 2
Pages 49-132 (June 2017)
Volume 21, Number 1
Pages 1-48 (March 2017)
Volume 20 (2016)
Volume 20, Number 4
Pages 273-354 (December 2016)
Volume 20, Number 3
Pages 181-271 (September 2016)
Volume 20, Number 2
Pages 85-179 (June 2016)
Volume 20, Number 1
Pages 1-83 (March 2016)
Volume 19 (2015)
Volume 19, Number 4
Pages 223-313 (December 2015)
Volume 19, Number 3
Pages 149-221 (September 2015)
Volume 19, Number 2
Pages 77-147 (June 2015)
Volume 19, Number 1
Pages 1-75 (March 2015)
Volume 18 (2014)
Volume 18, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 169-336 (September/December 2014)
Volume 18, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-167 (March/June 2014)
Volume 17 (2013)
Volume 17, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 149-369 (September/December 2013)
Volume 17, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-148 (March/June 2013)
Volume 16 (2012)
Volume 16, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 155-301 (September/December 2012)
Volume 16, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-154 (March/June 2012)
Volume 15 (2011)
Volume 15, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 157-296 (September/December 2011)
Volume 15, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-156 (March/June 2011)
Volume 14 (2010)
Volume 14, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 153-317 (September/December 2010)
Volume 14, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-151 (March/June 2010)
Volume 13 (2009)
Volume 13, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 155-321 (September/December 2009)
Volume 13, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-154 (March/June 2009)
Volume 12 (2008)
Volume 12, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 157-312 (September/December 2008)
Volume 12, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-155 (March/June 2008)
Volume 11 (2007)
Volume 11, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 157-322 (September/December 2007)
Volume 11, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-156 (March/June 2007)
Volume 10 (2006)
Volume 10, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 153-305 (September/December 2006)
Volume 10, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-151 (March/June 2006)
Volume 9 (2005)
Volume 9, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 131-269 (September/December 2005)
Volume 9, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-130 (March/June 2005)
Volume 8 (2004)
Volume 8, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 141-274 (September/December 2004)
Volume 8, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-139 (March/June 2004)
Volume 7 (2003)
Volume 7, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 107-230 (September/December 2003)
Volume 7, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-106 (March/June 2003)
Volume 6 (2002)
Volume 6, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 131-258 (September/December 2002)
Volume 6, Number 2
Pages 65-130 (June 2002)
Volume 6, Number 1
Pages 1-63 (March 2002)
Volume 5 (2001)
Volume 5, Number 4
Pages 225-311 (December 2001)
Volume 5, Number 3
Pages 155-224 (September 2001)
Volume 5, Number 2
Pages 87-154 (June 2001)
Volume 5, Number 1
Pages 1-86 (March 2001)
Volume 4 (2000)
Volume 4, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 159-288 (September/December 2000)
Volume 4, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 5-153 (March/June 2000)
Volume 3 (1999)
Volume 3, Number 4
Pages 223-282 (December 1999)
Volume 3, Number 3
Pages 147-221 (September 1999)
Volume 3, Number 2
Pages 71-145 (June 1999)
Volume 3, Number 1
Pages 1-70 (March 1999)
Volume 2 (1998)
Volume 2, Number 4
Pages 245-310 (December 1998)
Volume 2, Number 3
Pages 167-244 (September 1998)
Volume 2, Number 2
Pages 85-165 (June 1998)
Volume 2, Number 1
Pages 1-83 (March 1998)
Volume 1 (1997)
Volume 1, Number 4
Pages 255-324 (December 1997)
Volume 1, Number 3
Pages 169-254 (September 1997)
Volume 1, Number 2
Pages 93-168 (June 1997)
Volume 1, Number 1
Pages 1-80 (March 1997)
Forthcoming Articles
()
General Information
()
Published Articles By Year
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
1997 - 2025
Volume 4, Numbers 3 & 4 / September/December 2000 , Pages 159-288
Download Article 16.36 Kb
Special Issue on Asset Price Dynamics and Risk Management
Multinational Finance Journal, 2000, vol. 4, no. 3&4, pp. 155-157 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/4-3/4-1
Yin-Wong Cheung
, University of California Santa Cruz, U.S.A.
Corresponding Author
Email: cheung@ucsc.edu
Abstract:
no abstract
Keywords : n/a
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 740.74 Kb
Exchange Rate Returns Standardized by Realized Volatility are (Nearly) Gaussian
Multinational Finance Journal, 2000, vol. 4, no. 3&4, pp. 159-179 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/4-3/4-2
Torben G. Andersen
, Northwestern University, U.S.A.
Corresponding Author
Email: t-andersen@northwestern.edu
Tim Bollerslev
, Duke University and NBER, U.S.A.
Francis X. Diebold
, University of Pennsylvania and NBER, U.S.A.
Paul Labys
, University of Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Abstract:
It is well known that high-frequency asset returns are fat-tailed relative to the Gaussian distribution, and that the fat tails are typically reduced but not eliminated when returns are standardized by volatilities estimated from popular ARCH and stochastic volatility models. We consider two major dollar exchange rates, and we show that returns standardized instead by the realized volatilities of Andersen, Bollerslev, Diebold and Labys (2000a) are very nearly Gaussian. We perform both univariate and multivariate analyses, and we trace the differing effects of the different standardizations to differences in information sets
Keywords : high-frequency data; integrated volatility; realized volatility; risk management
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 71.59 Kb
Information, Announcement, and Listing Effects of ADR Programs and German-U.S. Stock Market Integration
Multinational Finance Journal, 2000, vol. 4, no. 3&4, pp. 181-200 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/4-3/4-3
Michael Hertzel
, Arizona State University, U.S.A.
Corresponding Author
Email: Michael.Hertzel@asu.edu
Paul Lowengrub
, Nathan Associates, U.S.A.
Michael Melvin
, Arizona State University, U.S.A.
Abstract:
This article analyzes the impact on stock prices in the home market of important events associated with a U.S. listing. Events include the "filing effect" of financial statements made public by the SEC in preparation for an ADR program; the "announcement effect" of the forthcoming ADR program; and the "listing effect" of the first day of U.S. trading. The sample includes German firms that listed in the U.S. between 1991 and 1997. While German accounting standards allow firms to show profits when U.S. GAAP would show losses, we find that the reconciliation to U.S. GAAP reported in the "filing effect" is associated with positive abnormal returns. Perhaps this reflects self-selection where firms with nothing to hide list in the U.S. The announcement effects are mixed across firms. The listing effect is associated with positive abnormal returns. We also find some evidence of volume migrating from the home market to the U.S. after U.S. trading begins
Keywords : ADRs; international cross-listing; international equity markets; German stocks
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 303.57 Kb
An Integrated Risk Management Method: VaR Approach
Multinational Finance Journal, 2000, vol. 4, no. 3&4, pp. 201-219 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/4-3/4-4
Hailiang Yang
, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Corresponding Author
Email: hlyang@hku.hk
Abstract:
This article presents a simple methodology for computing Value at Risk (VaR) for a portfolio of financial instruments that is sensitive to market risk, rating change, and default risk. An integrated model for market and credit risks is developed. The Jarrow, Lando and Turnbull model (the Markov chain model) is used to represent the dynamics of the credit rating. Procedures for calculating VaR are presented. Numerical illustration results are included
Keywords : credit rating; default risk; integrated risk management; Markov chain; value at risk
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 135.84 Kb
Investor Recognition of Bankrputcy Costs: Evidence from the 1987 Market Crash
Multinational Finance Journal, 2000, vol. 4, no. 3&4, pp. 221-245 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/4-3/4-5
Cheol S. Eun
, Georgia Institute of Technology, U.S.A.
Corresponding Author
Email: cheol.eun@mgt.gatech.edu
H. Jonathan Jang
, Inha University, Korea
Abstract:
In this paper, we examine the behavior of stock prices of individual firms with different bond ratings surrounding the October market crash of 1987 and therefrom make inferences about the significance of bankruptcy costs borne by stockholders. The key findings are as follows: Immediately following the crash, stock prices of firms with different bond ratings display dramatically divergent behavior. Specifically, stocks with speculative bond ratings exhibit significantly negative cumulative abnormal returns (CAR) in the wake of crash; the more speculative a firm's bond is, the more negative is the CAR of the firm's stock. Regression analysis confirms that there indeed exists a significantly negative relationship between the post-crash CARs and individual firms' bankruptcy risk proxied by their bond ratings, a variable that measures the likelihood of financial distress ex ante.
Keywords : n/a
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 241.83 Kb
High Frequency Deutsche Mark-US Dollar Returns: FIGARCH Representations and Non Linearities
Multinational Finance Journal, 2000, vol. 4, no. 3&4, pp. 247-267 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/4-3/4-6
Richard T. Baillie
, Michigan State University, U.S.A.
Corresponding Author
Email: baillie@msu.edu
Aydin A. Cecen
, Central Michigan University, U.S.A.
Young-Wook Han
, Michigan State University, U.S.A.
Abstract:
This article considers the use of the long memory volatility process, FIGARCH, in representing Deutschemark - US dollar spot exchange rate returns for both high and low frequency returns data. The FIGARCH model is found to be the preferred specification for both high frequency and daily returns data, with similar values of the long memory volatility parameter across frequencies, which is indicative of returns being generated by a self similar process. The BDS test for non-linearity is applied to the residuals of the model for the high frequency returns. No evidence is found to suggest that the procedure for filtering the high frequency returns to remove the intraday periodicity has induced any non-linearities in the residuals; and the FIGARCH specification is found to be adequate.
Keywords : BDS test; correlation dimension; FIGARCH; high frequency data; intra day periodicity; volatility
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 71.64 Kb
Diagnosing Shocks in Stock Market Returns of Greater China
Multinational Finance Journal, 2000, vol.4, no. 3&4, pp. 269-288 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/4-3/4-7
W.C Lo
, Open University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Corresponding Author
Email: n/a
W.S. Chan
, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Abstract:
Using a modified outlier identification procedure by Chen and Liu (1993), this article studies the large shocks of the Greater China stock markets. We find that while large shocks are typical in all the markets and more outliers appear in the Chinese stock markets than in the other markets. We also find that most of the outliers identified in the Hong Kong market cluster in the periods of the 1997 Asian financial crisis and after the government's market intervention in August 1998. With the exception of Hong Kong, most outliers seem to be driven by local events
Keywords : Greater China stock markets; large shocks; time series outliers
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Copyright © 2010. All rights reserved. Multinational Finace Society. Design and Development by:
Exarsis Business Solutions Ltd.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
.